Four reasons for Robin Hood to stop bombing this year
Although it was just a trailer, "Robin Hood" is likely to become the new bomber of the year.Not all films that are high-budget investments can earn huge profits from the box office. As in the case of Pacific Rim: Uprising a little while ago, Robin Hood of actor Taron Egerton converge many "potential" into the next bomb of 2018.
1. Robin Hood - The brand is no longer too popular
Robin Hood is a British legend with the marksmanship "hit cypress". He is also famous for the story of the robbers of the rich divided the poor during the dark period of the Middle Ages. With many anecdotes and mysterious embroidery around, Robin Hood quickly became the subject of never-before-Hollywood. But, the audience is already bored of this brand.
Almost every year, filmmakers are releasing a work or series related to the character. Robin Hood's latest blockbuster debut eight years ago, costing $ 200 million, has hit the box office despite the presence of A-list actors such as Russell Crowe, Cate Blanchett, Oscar Isaac, ... with the hands of director Ridley Scott. Everybody's hearty story about the archer and not much excited when a new movie to theaters anymore.
See more:
2. The Legend of the Sword (2017)
Historical films are no longer the trend of the audience in recent years. The two most prominent examples are The Huntsman: Winter's War (2016) and King Arthur: Legend of the Sword last year. In particular, the work of Guy Ritchie and Robin Hood has many interesting similarities.
Both were developed from a British mythology with a new addition to the script. The characters in the movie are quite colorful and do not fit the context of contemporary history. They give the audience the impression that they are watching a fantasy role-playing game on the big screen. And of course, the money is still there when King Arthur: Legend of the Sword makes Warner Bros. Hundreds of millions of dollars.
3. Taron Egerton is not the ticket office
The name Taron Edgerton emerged from the role of Eggsy in the Kingsman series. In fact, the success of the first came primarily from the novelty of filmmaking as well as the pride of Colin Firth. Meanwhile, Kingsman: The Golden Circle did not achieve the expected sales.Also, he has not had a role or any other memorable style. The viewer only remembers him as a young actor with a baby face. With Robin Hood, the British actor is not a name that is heavy enough to carry a blockbuster content that is not really good. In addition, the cast of Jamie Foxx, Ben Mendelsohn or Jamie Dornan was not impressed enough to draw audiences to the theater.
See more:
- Turns out the Hulk "physiological weakness" in "Avengers: Infinity War" is not because of cowardice!
- Avengers: Infinity War was cut 7 minutes into theaters, the director said
4. Is the manufacturer a little risky when it comes to trusting Otto Bathurst?
Otto Bathurst is a strange name for audiences around the world. Previously, he only made the series psychological drama series of England as Peaky Blinders or Criminal Justice and Five Days. Putting a blockbuster action of hundreds of millions of dollars into an inexperienced director like Bathurst is a risky decision for the producer?In fact, Hollywood seems to favor the use of lesser-known directors to act as blockbuster in the case of Kong: Skull Island (2017). Their ego is easier to control and navigate, as well as pay less than names such as Steven Spielberg or Ridley Scott, ... But, this is the gamble "to eat all fall" when the intervention Excessive studio levels sometimes produce lousy results. The lesson of The Mummy (2017) is not enough weight?
It seems Robin Hood's double-counting has been a bad sign. However, we have to wait until November 2 to get the final answer.
0 nhận xét:
Đăng nhận xét